Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pokémon List/Sample"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tornado9797 (talk | contribs) (Created the Talk:Pokémon List/Sample article.) |
Tryourbreast (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I was thinking of adding a "Locations" section where a chart can display where that [[Pokémon List|Pokémon]] may be found in order of highest percentage. However, I wasn't going to go through and edit every single page with this addition until I got confirmation. --[[User:Tornado9797|Tornado9797]] ([[User talk:Tornado9797|talk]]) 02:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC) | I was thinking of adding a "Locations" section where a chart can display where that [[Pokémon List|Pokémon]] may be found in order of highest percentage. However, I wasn't going to go through and edit every single page with this addition until I got confirmation. --[[User:Tornado9797|Tornado9797]] ([[User talk:Tornado9797|talk]]) 02:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
Maybe adding another list of all [[Pokémon List|Pokémons]] a player can obtain within the game at the newest version as well. As for the location part, the problem is the overall percentage are inconsistant, and 30% of 150% are not more flavorable than 25% of 100% despite 30% is bigger than 25%. So I think it should be added in visiting order instead. --[[User:Tryourbreast|Tryourbreast]] ([[User talk:Tryourbreast|talk]]) 05:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:37, 14 January 2013
I was thinking of adding a "Locations" section where a chart can display where that Pokémon may be found in order of highest percentage. However, I wasn't going to go through and edit every single page with this addition until I got confirmation. --Tornado9797 (talk) 02:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Maybe adding another list of all Pokémons a player can obtain within the game at the newest version as well. As for the location part, the problem is the overall percentage are inconsistant, and 30% of 150% are not more flavorable than 25% of 100% despite 30% is bigger than 25%. So I think it should be added in visiting order instead. --Tryourbreast (talk) 05:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)